ISLAMABAD/NEW DELHI — Pakistan and India are holding crucial three-days of water sharing talks in Islamabad, during which India raised the issue of storm drainage of Fazal Ka Nullah, and said that due to hindrances on the Pakistani side the water from the nullah was flowing back into India during floods and destroying large tracts of land.
The Indian side on Tuesday raised the issue of storm drainage nullah, namely Fazal Ka nullah, which enters Sutlej on the Pakistan side from eastern Punjab in India.
“India said that free flow of water of Fazal Ka nullah is not being done because of some hindrances from the Pakistan side. India also said that under the Indus Waters Treaty, free movement of water flow is imperative otherwise the water comes back and destroys the area in India when a flood hits.
The Pakistan side says that the Punjab Irrigation Department will respond on this issue and the Indian side will be informed accordingly,? and official told thenews.com.pk. On Wednesday, the two sides are to discuss small hydropower projects.
“Both sides will today (Wednesday) discuss small hydropower projects being erected on Pakistan rivers, including Pakal Dal and Lower Kalnai projects and other projects,” the official said.
Pakal Dal is proposed on the Marusudar river, a tributary of the Chenab river, in Kishtwar district in Jammu and Kashmir. The Lower Kalnai project is proposed in Kishtwar and Doda districts.
Pakistan is of the view that the designs of the above-mentioned hydropower projects negate the provisions of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), but India claims they are treaty compliant.
Under the IWT signed in 1960, waters of eastern rivers Sutlej, Beas, and Ravi, amounting to around 33 million acre-feet (MAF) annually, were allocated to India for unrestricted use.
The waters of western rivers Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab, amounting to around 135 MAF annually were assigned largely to Pakistan. However, India is permitted to construct the run-of-the-river plants on western rivers with limited storage as per criteria specified in the treaty.
One of the members of the Pakistani side said that the issue about the design of Pakal Dal (1,000MW) and Lower Kalnai would be resolved during the bilateral dialogue at the Permanent Commission of Indus Waters (PCIW) level.
Pakistan has already raised objections over the Pakal Dal project in the last talks with India. The official expressed optimism that Pakistan’s objections on the freeboard of the Lower Kalnai project will be resolved during these talks.
Pakistan wants the freeboard to be one meter in length, while India insists on a two-meter length. Freeboard is the vertical distance of a dam crest above the maximum reservoir water level.
The daily quoting top sources said that India has not only finished civil works but also almost completed the diversion tunnel for the Kiru Hydropower Project of 624MW on the Chenab River. Kiru is a run-of-the-river scheme being developed over the Chenab River in the Kishtwar Tehsil of Doha district in Jammu.
According to the sources, “On the site of Kiru project, work on the diversion tunnel, excavation of main access tunnel and audit of top and bottom pressure shaft is in progress along with the dam’s abutment stripping.
The project is scheduled to be completed by 2023. The dam has a height of 136 meters and a width of over 190 meters.” The Indian engineers have almost completed the construction of the first diversion tunnel having a length of over 650 meters and 9-meter in diameter.
More importantly, the over and invert concreting of the tunnel is almost near completion. Pakistan has raised objections to the design of the Kiru hydroelectric plant, but New Delhi maintains that the project is fully compliant with the Indus Water Treaty.
The two sides are meeting at the Permanent Commission of Indus Waters (PCIW) level on a six-point agenda, which also includes hydropower projects Pakal Dal (1,000MW), Kiru (624MW) and Lower Kalnai (48MW) being erected on the Chenab River and other projects being constructed on the Indus at Ladakh.
The agenda for three-day talks also includes Pakistan’s objections on Tamasha Hydro Electric Power (HEP) in Kargil district, Kalaroos-II HEP (in Kupwara district), Baltikulan Small, Darbuk Shyok HEP, Nummu Chilling HEP, Kargil Hunderman HEP, Phagla HEP, Mandi HEP, and Kulan Ramwari HEP.
On the first day, both sides held three rounds of talks and discussed the sharing of flood data, programme of meetings and tours of PICW for the current calendar year 2022. Both sides also discussed the Kiru Hydropower project, one of the officials who is part of the talks told The News.
The nine-member Indian side comprises three female officers. It is headed by Pradeep Kumar Saxena, Indian Commissioner for Indus Waters. The Pakistan side consisting of representatives of Wapda, Pakistan Met Dept, Punjab Irrigation, NESPAK, MoFA, Flood Commission and officers of PCIW is led by Syed Mehr Ali Shah, Joint Secretary Water, who is also Pakistan’s Commissioner for Indus Waters.
Pakistan asked India to restore sharing of the flood data based on humanitarian grounds, which New Delhi continued to share from 1989 till 2018 and then started reducing the share of data with Pakistan in 2019.
Pakistan pleaded that the flood data sharing is imperative for the Pakistan side to come into action on time to avoid catastrophic impact of flood on human lives.
“The Indian side has agreed to restore the sharing of flood data on time so that the Pakistan side could have ample time to help save human lives.” Both sides have also finalized the tours and meetings to be held in 2022 under the PCIW level and, to this effect, Pakistan asked India to also include a special visit of Kiru Hydropower project under the provision of Indus Waters Treaty.
India agreed to arrange a visit to the Kiru project. The official said that Pakistan in August last year had pinpointed some observations about the design of Kiru project and sought some clarifications. India on the project gave some clarifications, but Pakistan again raised some queries. India says that Pakistan should submit its queries on the project in written form and New Delhi will respond in 15 days’ time. — (AGENCIES)